Saturday, April 6, 2013

Why you shouldn't suck in your musical performance: the audience matters


Recently, one of my Facebook friends, who also happens to be a childhood schoolmate and accomplished musician, commented on Facebook lamenting how hard it was for him to find a band to join. This came hard on the heels of him having to give up forming his own band, due to what I’ll call “lack of interest in being dedicated” from the musicians he recruited. The gist of Nooj’s comment was, making music or anything with artistic value requires a certain level of commitment, and it’s hard to find people who want to make that commitment. Then a mutual Facebook friend, Pat, who is an accomplished musician himself and also a childhood schoolmate of Nooj and I, chimed in against musicians who dismiss bad performances in favor of “just having fun”. Pat and Nooj’s argument is, on the face of it, quite simple: There’s nothing fun about sucking and the value of music (the TRUE value) lies in the commitment that leads to a good performance. (And I’ll go so far as to say, the definition of a good performance is, a performance the audience appreciates.)

A rendering of the St. Mel's church, where Nooj, Pat, and I spent many hours while growing up.
I couldn't agree more, and I wanted to add my two cents, but Facebook isn’t my favorite forum in the whole world for making cohesive arguments. So I dragged the topic here, to my blog. Here’s what I've found in my (extremely limited) jazz performance experience. (Keep in mind, this is all from playing in big bands and ensembles at a local university, where 90% of every band I was in was about half my age. It’s an important aspect of the argument I’m about to make.)

I hate making mistakes in a performance. Hate them. That’s why musicians practice: to avoid mistakes. The jazz idiom, however, is all about creating something on the spot. It’s not going to be right 100% of the time. It’s not supposed to be. Miles Davis said, “There are no wrong notes.” In fact, there are plenty of wrong notes. It’s easy enough to send your audience home by playing wrong notes. But in jazz, you shouldn't be surprised if after sending one audience home, another audience stumbles in to hear you play. That’s one thing.

The other is, as an older musician with more worldly experience but often less musical experience and talent than my younger peers in the band, I bring a unique perspective to my performance. I don’t get embarrassed if I make a mistake. I’m not happy about it, but I just keep playing. Most of the audience doesn't notice anyway. Younger musicians sometimes tend to try too hard. Mistakes fluster them, and I've actually seen bad performances stop good musicians entirely, “forcing” them to quit and blaming their study workload as they put down their instrument. I tried to impart to these musicians that we are up there, in front of people, doing something that the majority can’t do, and we ought to enjoy the experience, regardless of the type of performance we put out on any given day. Ultimately, the audience is what makes the musical experience what it is. There is nothing like performing in front of living, breathing people. And in an age when you can download videos and music at a moment’s notice on a whim, the live experience becomes ever more valuable and important. My friend Pat asked, “What’s fun about sucking?” Well, of course the answer is, “Nothing much.” My problem is, I’m just not very good. Nobody’s ever going to pay significant money to hear me play anything, anywhere. Just the same, I’m committed to making music. I know I suck, but, I try to always have fun, even when I’m by myself. (Maybe that’s why I don’t get any better.) Do I enjoy good performances better than bad ones? You bet I do. But I recognize that not every performance is going to be my best, but I can still (sorry Pat) have fun. I have to, because like I said, I pretty much suck all the time.

So basically, what I’m trying to say is, commitment is necessary, talent and ability, maybe not so much. What’s probably the most frustrating is somebody with talent and ability who doesn't make the most of it, especially for middle of the road musicians like me who are counting on them to cover for me a little, and especially when the talented musician is 19 years old and doesn't understand or appreciate what he’s missing if he or she gives up music for the wrong reason. If you are committed to making the musical experience of you, your band, and the audience the best it can be, bad notes are forgivable and you can mistakes all day long. I’m still going to ask you why you didn't practice a little longer the week before the gig, but we’ll all be better off for the experience than if we’d passed on it altogether.

And if Pat and Nooj ever want to play some jazz (Pat is punk/grunge, Nooj is rock) with me, I’ll hold up my end if they just don’t ask too much. I know we’d have fun, no matter what.

Yep. No way that was going to be a Facebook comment.

2 comments:

Nooj said...

Well written ECS. I'd like to expound or add to your post if I may be so bold. This applies to all skill levels and abilities. If 4 guys want to get together and have fun and they are pretty much all on the same page with that, then fine. I personally am not interested in the Viagra commercial: Thursday night jamming in our friends cool and spacious garage with the Chinese rug and comfy furniture laid out in our Lands End clothes kickin’ the blues laughing and looking at each other with that knowing look that we all will be banging our hot wives shortly when we are through with our “set”. Not yet, anyway.
I feel that if you can up the commitment level the end result will be actually more fun than just "skipping getting tight on the ending", for example. My issues with my "fizzled" project was something I find quite common with many musicians and leads to much disappointment with me because I am the opposite. They often times want to be in multiple projects/bands at the same time. That is great except you spread yourself so thin there is never any time or commitment to any single project, that is what ultimately led to the demise of my latest venture. My issues were yes, some on the musical aspect but much of it was the lack of a structured commitment musically meant I was unable to get the visual aspect together for the project. The music genre we were playing could be heard at every jam night in every city everywhere, I wanted to make us stand out by being really good and tight which was a no doubter with the guys we had (very talented) but also bring some video loops, stage props, etc. to the mix for a full entertaining crowd experience. Not see 4 guys in jeans and a t-shirt sitting at the bar and 20 minutes later they are up on stage as "the band" same outfits just playing. Youtube is huge for a reason, people demand something to look at also now, that is just the way it is. So in my case, the "sucking in the musical performance" was more a "sucking in the commitment to the entire performance sight and sound".
And as far as not posting on facebook? Screw it, post your blog comments there too. I like reading more than 4 words or looking at a stupid picture regarding a topic.

Eric said...

Yes, yes, and yes. Anything to improve the experience for the audience improves the effect of the music. I'm with you all the way.

I'd put more stuff on FB, but you beat me to all the good ideas.